Stupid Ipv6 question...

Scott Morris swm at emanon.com
Fri Nov 19 19:04:19 UTC 2004


Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?

;)

Scott 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...


Leo Bicknell wrote:

> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length.  Configuring a /1 to a
> /128 seems to work just fine.  If anyone knows of gear imposing 
> narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know 
> about them.
> 

64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.

--
Kevin Loch





More information about the NANOG mailing list