Stupid Ipv6 question...
Scott Morris
swm at emanon.com
Fri Nov 19 19:04:19 UTC 2004
Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?
;)
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length. Configuring a /1 to a
> /128 seems to work just fine. If anyone knows of gear imposing
> narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know
> about them.
>
64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.
--
Kevin Loch
More information about the NANOG
mailing list