who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

Thu Nov 18 16:35:04 UTC 2004

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:29:10 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu said:

> The point is that Randy was wrong when he said there weren't any v6 ISPs

Citation error on my part.  I missed a level of > in the original:

On 11/18/04 5:44 AM, "Mike Leber" <mleber at he.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> in august 2002 there were no v6 isp's.

Sorry.  Randy was quoting somebody else...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041118/012a418f/attachment.sig>