Summary of 3Com switches

Dan Lockwood dlockwood at shastacoe.org
Mon Nov 15 01:18:22 UTC 2004


These responses capture the essence of the messages that I received on the topic.  Thanks for all your input.
 
 
"If your looking for big dumb cheap devices to just move data around a big switched network, 3com is your vendor. If you plan on doing 
anything fancier than SNMP, best look elsewhere. "
 
 
"I worked with 7700 and 7700Rs, along with the new 3xxx series, and 
all I can say summarizes to simple: don't do it. There is Cisco, 
Enterasys, Allied Telesyn, but 3COM is just tumbling down. 

Line cards for 7700 are seriously limited in functionality, current 
Supervisor can't do wire (8Gbit/s FD) duplex on all cards simultaneusly, 
and the 7700R marketed "few seconds failover" goes up to 5-6 minutes 
which is actually longer than booting the switch from cold dead state. 

The BGP sucks, and OSPF sucks even more (it can kill whole switch in 
certain situations I can't speak of at the moment). 

Same thing is with the routers - 3000 and 5000 suck, the 6000 suck 
even more (1 ATM OC3 interface with 30Mbit/s worth of traffic 
generates 85% of CPU load on 6080 and router begins to drop traffic..."

--------------------^ This guy went and bought C gear.

 

"Well, they aren't service provider switches - they are enterprise focused, and have a very iffy SP feature set. They are also Huwei boxes, rebadged. This means they may (or may not) possess stolen intellectual property. "

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041114/317283b2/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list