anycast roots

Sat Nov 13 18:44:01 UTC 2004

At 04:25 AM 13-11-04 +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> >
> > bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > >
> > >     for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> > >     publication method, ...
> > >
> >
> > as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate, and has
> > 100% participation amongst root server operators wrt publishing accurate
> > information.  if bill knows otherwise, i'd like him to say so, and offer
> > specifics both as to what information is not present, and where it can be
> > found today, and where it can be found in the future.
> >
> > if bill is not actually aware of any missing information, i'd like him to
> > say so, since it's possible to infer from his comments here that the web
> > site is inaccurate or out-of-date in some way he's directly aware of, and
> > i just don't think that's true.
> > --
> > Paul Vixie
>
>
>         please remove all public informtion about "B" from
>         http://www.root-servers.org.   The public data about "B"
>         on that site is not 100% accurate and does not have 100% 
> participation
>         amoungst root-server operators  wrt publishing accurate information.

For what purpose?  Is B (ISI) is need of more secrecy than say G (US 
DoD)?  I always thought we strive for more transparency than for 
less.  Perhaps if ISI can't play nice like all the other roots, I am sure 
there are many other organizations that would be happy to host B.

-Hank

>         plesae be apprised that your thinking here is inaccurate.
>
>--bill