The Cidr Report

Sat Nov 13 18:38:24 UTC 2004

At 02:47 PM 12-11-04 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > ASnum    NetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description
> >
> > AS18566      751        6      745    99.2%   CVAD Covad Communications
> > AS4134       825      178      647    78.4%   CHINANET-BACKBONE
> >                                                No.31,Jin-rong Street
> > AS4323       794      223      571    71.9%   TWTC Time Warner Telecom
> > AS6197       814      430      384    47.2%   BNS-14 BellSouth Network
> >                                                Solutions, Inc
> > AS22773      401       17      384    95.8%   CXA Cox Communications Inc.
> > AS27364      413       45      368    89.1%   ARMC Armstrong Cable Services
> > AS701       1230      884      346    28.1%   UU UUNET Technologies, Inc.
> > AS22909      412       81      331    80.3%   CMCS Comcast Cable
> >                                                Communications, Inc.
>
>are these numbers what i think, but hope not, they are?
>
>e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be
>collapsed to 6?

Barry and me tried:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html

Covad was first contacted Aug 2002:
>ASnum    NetsNow NetsCIDR  NetGain  % Gain   Description
>AS18566  264     4         260      98.5%    COVAD Covad Communications

But Covad was just one.  I used to quietly contact these "pollutors" along 
with a few others who helped out (Barry and Terry) but as of a year ago I'm 
giving my 5-10 hours of volunteerism per month to nsp-sec.

-Hank

>if not, then perhaps the report could use some work.
>
>if so, then
>   o why are providers indulging is such extremely sick
>     behavior
>   o and who can hack the perl to generate filters for this
>     so we can listen only to the aggregates
>
>randy