IPV6 renumbering painless?
Paul Vixie
vixie at vix.com
Fri Nov 12 04:03:46 UTC 2004
iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) writes:
> Wow, IPv6 misinformation is reaching unprecendented heights here on
> NANOG...
yes. for example, you wrote...
> There is currently no PI in IPv6 unless you're an internet exchange or
> a root server.
...but i really do think of 2001:4f8::/32 as PI, even though ISC is neither
an IX nor a rootserver. (f-root has its own /48, which is something else.)
--
Paul Vixie
More information about the NANOG
mailing list