Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Wed Nov 10 14:55:26 UTC 2004 

> If IPv6 had "local scope" addresses, then NAT would not be
> necessary to prevent traffic from flowing through the
> unauthorized link.

yes.  just like we see no 1918 leakage now.

randy

More information about the NANOG mailing list