Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

Joe Abley jabley at isc.org
Mon Nov 8 23:50:53 UTC 2004



On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:18, Adi Linden wrote:

>
>> I don't know of any applications that require RFC1918 addresses to be
>> deployed. (Clearly, this is not to say there are none.)
>
> There are a number of good and reasonable uses for RFC1918 addresses.
>
> [one reasonable use]

Yes, I mentioned that in the paragraph following the one you quoted. 
There is more than one way to skin that cat, however, and not every way 
requires RFC1918 address analogues to be made available in v6.


Joe




More information about the NANOG mailing list