Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

Joe Abley jabley at isc.org
Mon Nov 8 19:36:21 UTC 2004



On 8 Nov 2004, at 14:25, Leo Bicknell wrote:

>    In the end I think we need 1918 style space, and that it should
>    simply be set aside as a large block and expected to never be
>    useful in the context of other organizations, just like 1918
>    space is today.

Just out of interest, why do you think 1918-style space for v6 is 
needed?


Joe




More information about the NANOG mailing list