Low latency forwarding failure detection
Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
fergdawg at netzero.net
Thu Nov 4 15:33:11 UTC 2004
John,
I'm using GLBP round-robin in a specific scenario with
"ip routing" as the tracking mechanism, and only in this
one specific segment if the network (OSPF elsewhere), with
EIGRP as the routing protocol between R1, R2, R3, and R4:
-----+---FE----+-----
| |
R1 R2
| |
T3 T3
| |
R3 R4
| |
----+----FE---+-----
GLBP works very well here for us based on EIGRP routing
metrics.
There's a very good GLBP config white paper on CCO.
No sure if this answers your question, or not....
- ferg
-- John Kristoff <jtk at northwestern.edu> wrote:
I'm cco-familiar with GLBP. It appears to have essentially the same
timing knobs with the ability to actively load balance traffic. Is
my assumption that some traffic will not experience any packet loss
if it is not using the failed path correct? For anyone who has used
this, was the added complexity of this protocol worth it?
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg at netzero.net or
fergdawg at sbcglobal.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list