Cisco HFR

Petri Helenius pete at he.iki.fi
Thu May 27 08:19:56 UTC 2004


Tony Li wrote:

>
> I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would
> undertake, and that would make some sense.  However, I hope that they
> focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second.  No point
> in porting what isn't stable.
>
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily 
updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)

Pete




More information about the NANOG mailing list