Cisco HFR
Petri Helenius
pete at he.iki.fi
Thu May 27 08:19:56 UTC 2004
Tony Li wrote:
>
> I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would
> undertake, and that would make some sense. However, I hope that they
> focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second. No point
> in porting what isn't stable.
>
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily
updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)
Pete
More information about the NANOG
mailing list