Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG

Mon Mar 15 18:52:06 UTC 2004

Stop it children.  The thousands of people on this mailing list do not need 
to watch this road kill. -ren

At 06:11 PM 3/15/2004 +0000, John Harold wrote:

>Yes, Gregory Taylor aka "OseK" is a perfect gentlemen now.  Here are logs 
>from Feb 4th 2004 showing him being a perfect gentlemen...
>
>(08:35:45) <#sigdie!OseK_> :[NEMESIS] Nodes are attacking 212.242.41.0/24 
>on port 666 for 60 seconds using spoofed TCP RESET Packets ...
>(08:36:04) <#sigdie!OseK_> doesn't help the port 666 tho :(
>(08:36:31) <#sigdie!OseK_> you prolly have a much larger dosnet than me tho
>(08:36:34) <#sigdie!OseK_> i only have 500 nodes
>(08:38:55) <#sigdie!OseK_> you dropped it
>(08:38:58) <#sigdie!OseK_> so it cant take ICMP
>(08:39:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> what'd you hit?
>(08:39:18) <#sigdie!p> .17
>(08:39:54) <#sigdie!OseK_> down
>(08:39:55) <#sigdie!OseK_> i got it
>(08:39:56) <#sigdie!OseK_> :)
>(08:40:03) <#sigdie!p> let me try by myself !
>(08:40:07) <#sigdie!p> no
>(08:40:07) <#sigdie!p> its up
>(08:40:08) <#sigdie!OseK_> hold
>(08:40:10) <#sigdie!OseK_> wait 60 seconds
>(08:40:15) <#sigdie!OseK_> ah
>(08:40:16) <#sigdie!OseK_> wtf
>(08:40:20) <#sigdie!OseK_> i only dropped one box?
>(08:40:29) <#sigdie!OseK_> cuz it wouldn't respond for a second there
>(08:40:44) <#sigdie!OseK_> i wanna fucking drop banetele
>(08:40:49) <#sigdie!p> well
>(08:40:50) <#sigdie!p> my turn
>(08:40:51) <#sigdie!OseK_> cuz those fags are the ones that put that page 
>up on there
>(08:40:55) <#sigdie!OvEr_LoAD> lol lets do it
>(08:41:05) <#sigdie!p> OK
>(08:41:06) <#sigdie!p> wach
>(08:41:08) <#sigdie!p> watch
>(08:41:13) <#sigdie!p> is everyone watching
>(08:41:18) <#sigdie!OseK_> yeah
>(08:41:28) <#sigdie!OseK_> pwned
>(08:41:31) <#sigdie!OseK_> p-
>(08:41:32) <#sigdie!OseK_> u
>(08:41:34) <#sigdie!p> no i didnt even do anything
>(08:41:35) <#sigdie!OseK_> pwn
>(08:41:36) <#sigdie!p> :P
>(08:41:38) <#sigdie!OseK_> wtf
>(08:41:44) <#sigdie!OseK_> why are they all fucked now
>(08:41:48) <#sigdie!p> they arent..
>(08:42:01) <#sigdie!p> unless youre talking about 212.242.41.35
>(08:42:05) <#sigdie!p> im flooding its httpd
>(08:42:28) <#sigdie!p> ok ok
>(08:42:29) <#sigdie!p> watch
>(08:42:57) <#sigdie!p> bewm
>(08:43:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ok
>(08:43:02) <#sigdie!OseK_> dammit
>(08:43:05) <#sigdie!OseK_> you hit it right when i do
>(08:43:07) <#sigdie!p> it doesnt like ICMP
>(08:43:07) <#sigdie!OseK_> i can never tell
>(08:43:10) <#sigdie!OseK_> if my shit is working
>(08:43:22) <#sigdie!OseK_> :)
>(08:43:33) <#sigdie!OseK_> its up
>(08:43:44) <#sigdie!p> i only did 50 seconds
>(08:44:06) <#sigdie!OseK_> hrm
>(08:44:20) <#sigdie!p> 212.242.41.17 no like the icmp
>(08:45:19) <#sigdie!OseK_> ok
>(08:45:23) <#sigdie!OseK_> imma go play with banetele
>(08:48:02) <#sigdie!OseK_> i just collapsed banetele's BGP announcement
>(08:48:09) <#sigdie!OseK_> but that doesn't help
>(08:48:13) <#sigdie!OseK_> cuz they're not gonna split
>(08:48:43) <#sigdie!p> i dunno banetele looks dead
>(08:48:48) <#sigdie!p> or maybe im just lagging
>(08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... BitchX: Sent server ping to [irc.banetele.no]
>(08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... Server pong from irc.banetele.no 0.8224 seconds
>(08:49:12) <#sigdie!p> bash-2.05a$ telnetirc.banetele.no 6667
>(08:49:13) <#sigdie!p> Trying 213.239.111.2...
>(08:49:16) <#sigdie!OseK_> thats cuz I collapsed their BGP announcement by 
>nailing their router head on(08:49:26) <#sigdie!OseK_> but they have a 
>secondary route to efnet
>(08:49:30) <#sigdie!_mre|42o> BGP announcement?
>(08:49:31) <#sigdie!OseK_> thru their multihomed connection
>(08:49:32) <#sigdie!OseK_> yeah
>(08:49:37) <#sigdie!OseK_> they have a collapsable route
>(08:49:44) <#sigdie!OseK_> using the border gateway protocl
>(08:49:54) <#sigdie!OseK_> hey have to announce to a pool
>(08:49:58) <#sigdie!OseK_> in order to establish their route
>(08:50:07) <#sigdie!OseK_> but if thye get hit enough their router drops 
>the announcements
>(08:50:10) <#sigdie!OseK_> and they lose their routes
>(08:50:14) <#sigdie!OseK_> its wierd
>(08:50:21) <#sigdie!OseK_> i dont quite understand how it works myself
>(08:50:33) <#sigdie!OseK_> its something you only find UU net and IRC 
>servers doing
>(08:50:34) <#sigdie!OseK_> hehe
>(08:51:19) <#sigdie!OseK_> they should recover now
>(08:51:21) <#sigdie!OseK_> any time
>(08:53:30) <#sigdie!OseK_> damn
>(08:48:02) <#sigdie!OseK_> i just collapse
>(08:48:09) <#sigdie!OseK_> but that doesn't help
>(08:48:13) <#sigdie!OseK_> cuz they're not gonna split
>(08:48:43) <#sigdie!p> i dunno banetele looks dead
>(08:48:48) <#sigdie!p> or maybe im just lagging
>(08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... BitchX: Sent server ping to [irc.banetele.no]
>(08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... Server pong from irc.banetele.no 0.8224 seconds
>(08:49:12) <#sigdie!p> bash-2.05a$ telnet irc.banetele.no 6667
>(08:49:13) <#sigdie!p> Trying 213.239.111.2...
>(08:49:16) <#sigdie!OseK_> thats cuz I collapsed their BGP announcement by 
>nailing their router head on
>(08:49:26) <#sigdie!OseK_> but they have a secondary route to efnet
>(08:49:30) <#sigdie!_mre|42o> BGP announcement?
>(08:49:31) <#sigdie!OseK_> thru their multihomed connection
>(08:49:32) <#sigdie!OseK_> yeah
>(08:49:37) <#sigdie!OseK_> they have a collapsable route
>(08:49:44) <#sigdie!OseK_> using the border gateway protocl
>(08:49:54) <#sigdie!OseK_> hey have to announce to a pool
>(08:49:58) <#sigdie!OseK_> in order to establish their route
>(08:50:07) <#sigdie!OseK_> but if thye get hit enough their router drops 
>the announcements
>(08:50:10) <#sigdie!OseK_> and they lose their routes
>(08:50:14) <#sigdie!OseK_> its wierd
>(08:50:21) <#sigdie!OseK_> i dont quite understand how it works myself
>(08:50:33) <#sigdie!OseK_> its something you only find UU net and IRC 
>servers doing
>(08:50:34) <#sigdie!OseK_> hehe
>(08:51:19) <#sigdie!OseK_> they should recover now
>(08:51:21) <#sigdie!OseK_> any time
>(08:53:30) <#sigdie!OseK_> damn
>(08:53:34) <#sigdie!OseK_> banetele's getting nailed hard
>(08:53:52) <#sigdie!OseK_> i didnt realize their ircd is using the same 
>core router as their web page
>(08:53:53) <#sigdie!p> and its still linked to efnet fine
>(08:55:23) <#sigdie!OseK_> yeah
>(08:55:26) <#sigdie!OseK_> they have a second link
>(08:55:28) <#sigdie!OseK_> to the hub
>(08:55:32) <#sigdie!OseK_> thru another line
>(08:55:36) <#sigdie!p> anyone wanna read something funny?
>(08:55:38) <#sigdie!OseK_> its almost a requirement on efnet anymore
>(08:55:40) <#sigdie!OseK_> sure
>(08:55:45) <#sigdie!p> 
>http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8579692%5E13762,00.html
>(08:55:51) <#sigdie!OseK_> <p-> 
>http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8579692%5E13762,00.html
>(08:55:56) <#sigdie!OseK_> god damn it
>(08:56:02) <#sigdie!OseK_> i was only trying to copy the url
>(08:56:04) <#sigdie!p> one exerpt from it
>(08:56:05) <#sigdie!p> i will show
>(08:56:10) <#sigdie!p> "He told police he noticed a brown female stray dog 
>wagging its tail and "acting sexy" and pulled it into some tall grass by 
>the roadside."
>(08:56:22) <#sigdie!OseK_> OMG
>(08:57:27) <#sigdie!gh0tzt> have you guys seen those movie commercials for 
>anti piracy?
>(08:57:34) <#sigdie!p> yes
>(08:57:43) <#sigdie!gh0tzt> where the guy is like "I'm just a poor stunt 
>double trying to make it, and when people click a few times blahblahblah"
>(08:58:01) <#sigdie!p> get a better job
>(08:58:02) <#sigdie!p> fuck face
>(08:58:38) <#sigdie!gh0tzt> I wish they'd make a pro-piracy commercial.
>have some kid sitting next to a computer like "I'm just a poor college 
>student on loans, and when cd prices rise to $21 from $13.50 and I don't 
>have a car..."
>(08:58:47) <#sigdie!p> pepsi has a pro piracy
>(08:58:52) <#sigdie!p> i sa it during the super bowl
>(08:58:54) <#sigdie!p> it said
>(08:58:59) <#sigdie!gh0tzt> really?
>(08:59:02) <#sigdie!p> 'we are the youth'
>(08:59:02) <#sigdie!gh0tzt> how'd it say that
>(08:59:09) <#sigdie!p> 'and we're gonna keep downloading music'
>(08:59:16) <#sigdie!p> 'you cant stop us'
>(08:59:23) <#sigdie!OseK_> 208.173.218.94 <-- p, want some fun?
>(08:59:36) <#sigdie!OseK_> one of the (hidden) routers on banetele's BGP 
>pool :)
>
>It's a good thing for us that he's a white hat now!
>
>Greg the packet kiddie OseK Wrote:
>
>Matthew (yes I know it is you), The personal information you have posted 
>regarding my phone number is me.  However, the slanderous material and 
>obvious hate/flame statements you made against me are absolutely false.
>
>I have not attacked any Internet Service Provider or IRC server in several 
>years.  I am and have been retired from the underground for a long while 
>now, despite the constant comments made to the contrary by people who do 
>not represent me in any manner.
>
>I admit publically to everyone who may read this posting, that I have made 
>some very stupid decisions in the past and I had hurt alot of people in 
>the process.  Despite my attempts to justify my actions, the fact is two 
>wrongs do not make a right.
>
>XWB is my dad's personal sole propietership.  Not once has anyone involved 
>with XWB ever attempted to represent that business as anything more than a 
>Sole propietership that does web development work for non-profit 
>organizations and small businesses.  My father works very hard and your 
>attempt at attacking his character was uncalled for and unnecessary.  I do 
>not know what your problem with me is, Matthew, but whatever they are, you 
>need to leave them off of NANOG and the phone calls to my house are not 
>appreciated either.
>
>I hope you realize that posting personal information about people, such as 
>phone numbers, addresses, and any other such stuff to a public forum 
>without the consent of the person to whom that information belongs to, is 
>illegal.
>It is a felony in fact.  Your unfounded truthless statements about myself 
>and my father's business are a felony as well and if I wanted to take 
>action, could end in a civil lawsuit against you for libel and slander.
>
>Will I take that approach?  Probably not, mostly because the people on 
>this list, minus certain people, are for the most part mature, intelligent 
>adults who do not care to take part in flame wars, nor do they listen to 
>slanderous statements made by someone who obviously has some kind of 
>jealousy towards someone to the point that he has to make public 
>unprovoked attacks against that person's character.
>
>The people who matter on this list will most likely ignore this thread and 
>what not.
>
>Good luck in whatever future endeavor you may take.
>And this is my only and last response to this thread.
>
>Greg
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>One-click access to Hotmail from any Web page  download MSN Toolbar now! 
>http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
>