UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS

Steve Francis steve at expertcity.com
Fri Mar 5 23:31:24 UTC 2004


Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

>
>
>uRPF in the core seems like a bad plan, what with diverse routes and such.
>Loose-mode might help SOME, but really spoofing is such a low priority
>issue why make it a requirement? Customer triggered blackholing is a nice
>feature though.
>
>  
>
Obviously loose-mode. 
Spoofing may not be the current weapon of choice, but why not encourage 
the best net infrastructure?




More information about the NANOG mailing list