The use of .0/.255 addresses.
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun Jun 27 20:52:34 UTC 2004
On 27-jun-04, at 16:12, Peter Corlett wrote:
>> I currently have a few .255/32s with Cisco and Foundry products and
>> have various windows/linux/OSX machines that access them without
>> problems..
> Well, I'd expect Linux and OSX to do the right thing. It just seems to
> be Windows that makes a complete sow's ear of it.
If you want to have some real fun, try configuring some class E
addresses. Windows of course won't have it, and Cisco also doesn't want
anything to do with it, even to the point of rejecting routes within
240.0.0.0/4 when they come in over BGP. (Which an MacOSX box running
Zebra will happily provide.)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list