[OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)
Paul Jakma
paul at clubi.ie
Fri Jun 11 17:15:16 UTC 2004
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
> reply-to: headers are bad.
Oh, on that I agree.
There are draft RFCs to specify these things better, eg seperating
the concept of 'Reply-to' into one policy for list related replies
and another for personal, mutt supports these drafts already[1], but
there hasnt been much apparent movement in these drafts becoming
standards track. (primarily because there are already similar headers
defined and RFC standards tracked for NNTP readers/posters).
1. which can be annoying when dealing with mutt users.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie paul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam at dishone.st
Fortune:
The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list