concern over public peering points
Christopher L. Morrow
christopher.morrow at mci.com
Mon Jul 5 23:54:18 UTC 2004
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> The correct phrasing is indeed "one less network" and not "one less
> router." It's rarely one device in my experience.
I'm not sure the number of routers matters much anymore, with more and
more MPLS deployment you can't be sure that the path from A to B goes
directly from A to B, it might go through F, G, H, I before B :( It's
probably more relevant the path RTT isn't it?
More information about the NANOG
mailing list