concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat Jul 3 16:25:57 UTC 2004
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
> no. in the first case, you're just hiding the incremental costs.
> eventually, some bean counter is gonna want to recover them, and
> then folk get quite unhappy.
What costs are you referring to? You basically need a few hours time per
month from engineers and billing department. This for an exchange that has
20 ISPs connected to it. The amount of traffic isn't really a factor, but
the one I know of and am part of running carries multi-gigabit.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG
mailing list