concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat Jul 3 16:25:57 UTC 2004


On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:

> no.  in the first case, you're just hiding the incremental costs.
> eventually, some bean counter is gonna want to recover them, and
> then folk get quite unhappy.

What costs are you referring to? You basically need a few hours time per 
month from engineers and billing department. This for an exchange that has 
20 ISPs connected to it. The amount of traffic isn't really a factor, but 
the one I know of and am part of running carries multi-gigabit.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se




More information about the NANOG mailing list