Outbound Route Optimization

Mon Jan 26 15:30:38 UTC 2004

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:35:38 GMT, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com  said:

> and such things may also be possible with MPLS. But are any of
> the researchers seriously looking at how to provide a network
> in which all packets flow through two diverse paths to provide
> better reliability?

There's enough banana-eaters that can't get their heads wrapped around
the way BGP does things.  How many "I have a routing issue" postings
are we going to see with a protocol that splits up packet streams?

I'm going to assert that *in the aggregate*, network optimality is higher when
there's only one path, because when it dies it gets fixed.  If you have two
paths, and one is lossy/congested/etc, the resulting jitter and retransmits
will (a) make things worse and (b) be too much for the banana eaters.

Yes, we can probably make something "better" than BGP.  But will we
be able to understand it?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20040126/e64e8214/attachment.sig>