AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?

ken emery ken at cnet.com
Thu Jan 22 22:28:05 UTC 2004


On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Brett Watson wrote:

>
> First, yes I know I should call AT&T but I want to know if anyone else sees
> this problem:
>
> I have a customer that is multi-homed to AT&T and WCOM.  They accept
> "default" via BGP from both providers and announce a handful of prefixes to
> both providers.
>
> Given that they receive default, it's just the same as if they had a
> *static* default to both providers.
>
> The customer installed a "network mapping tool" today and suddenly
> discovered they were seeing RFC1918 addresses in the map (hundreds of them)
> that were *not* part of the customer's internal network.  It turns out that
> from what we can tell, insightbb.com (an AT&T sub or customer) is probably
> unintentionally leaking 10/8 and AT&T is propogating that across their
> network.    Since the customer defaults for any "unknown" destination,
> they're crossing the AT&T network.
>
> If my customer had been taking full routing, with appropriate filters of
> course, they wouldn't be seeing this.  But given that they are taking
> default, they see it.
>
> So I just wanted to see if anyone that is defaulting to AT&T is seeing this
> same problem just to verify that what we're seeing is correct (for my
> customer's edification).  Yes, I'm calling AT&T now :)

Yep, they are sending 10.X.X.X routes to customers.  From several places
actually, Level3, Comcast (multiple AS's), AT&T, MediaOne, and AccessPoint.

bye,
ken emery




More information about the NANOG mailing list