AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?

Brett Watson brett at the-watsons.org
Thu Jan 22 22:21:01 UTC 2004


First, yes I know I should call AT&T but I want to know if anyone else sees
this problem:

I have a customer that is multi-homed to AT&T and WCOM.  They accept
"default" via BGP from both providers and announce a handful of prefixes to
both providers.

Given that they receive default, it's just the same as if they had a
*static* default to both providers.

The customer installed a "network mapping tool" today and suddenly
discovered they were seeing RFC1918 addresses in the map (hundreds of them)
that were *not* part of the customer's internal network.  It turns out that
from what we can tell, insightbb.com (an AT&T sub or customer) is probably
unintentionally leaking 10/8 and AT&T is propogating that across their
network.    Since the customer defaults for any "unknown" destination,
they're crossing the AT&T network.

If my customer had been taking full routing, with appropriate filters of
course, they wouldn't be seeing this.  But given that they are taking
default, they see it.

So I just wanted to see if anyone that is defaulting to AT&T is seeing this
same problem just to verify that what we're seeing is correct (for my
customer's edification).  Yes, I'm calling AT&T now :)

-b
 




More information about the NANOG mailing list