New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

Mon Jan 19 21:41:23 UTC 2004

Not to rain on your parade, but, how do you know 71 will go to ARIN and
not to RIPE, APNIC, or LACNIC or AfriNIC?

Owen

--On Monday, January 19, 2004 9:27 -0800 william at elan.net wrote:

>
>
> It has been known for quite some time that next block to be allocated to
> ARIN is 70/8 (and next one will be 71/8). It might have been nice if ARIN
> were to run projections and inform community that by its projections it
> will be requesting new /8 ip block in say 2 month time.
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16.01 13:13, jlewis at lewis.org wrote:
>> > ...
>> > Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before
>> > allocating IPs from new blocks.  I know it's not their job to make sure
>> > IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as
>> > holders of all the IPs, they are in the best position to setup such
>> > test sites that would expose problems before they're dumped on
>> > members.
>>
>> Personally I agree with you and I will argue accordingly in the relevant
>> places. Cooperation with the bogon project seems logical too.
>>
>> Daniel
>

-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20040119/05b6cd0b/attachment.sig>