Cable and Wireless Security Contact?

Mon Jan 5 03:02:09 UTC 2004

"nanog in spoof name shocker!"

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> 
> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Cox <Richard at mandarin.com> writes:
> 
>     Richard> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:40:38 +0800 someone claiming to be
>     Richard> "Richard Cocks" <investigator at hellokitty.com> wrote:
> 
>     Richard> {snip}
> 
>     Richard> For the record, neither that post, nor the earlier post
>     Richard> which asserted a Sender name of "Hijacked-L" were from,
>     Richard> or in any way authorised by me.
> 
> Richard,
> 
> The account investigator at hellokitty.com has been terminated for a
> violation of our AUP.
> 
> Richard>  nycmny1-ar7-4-46-056-062.nycmny1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net
> Richard>  [4.46.56.62]  dnsbl.njabl.org : BLOCKED
> Richard>  [4.46.56.62]  dnsbl.sorbs.net : BLOCKED
> 
> That's just because it is a dynamic IP.  A previous post (the
> hijacked-l one I think) came from a roadrunner DSL line, also in new
> york.
> 
> Might be interesting to find out which nanog poster
> 
> 1. Lives in or around New York
> 2. Is interested in suppressing hijacked netblocks
> 
> [both of which are really excellent things, in themselves]
> 
> ... and ...
> 
> 3. Is willing to forge another nanog poster's name in an attempt to
>    stay anonymous, or maybe get around filters / nanog moderators etc.
> 
>    srs
> 
> 