How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)

• Previous message (by thread): How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
• Next message (by thread): How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Alex Bligh wrote:

> Because you always want to get to an E911 service in the same AS
> number...

You do or you dont? I dont see why anycast addresses need or need not 
be restricted to same AS.
 
> (seriously, read the sip & sipping w/gs)

Havnt got the time. :) Unless you have a URL or somesuch as to put me
straight as to why anycast addresses would not be suitable.

However, I'll wager that at some point a URI is translated to an IP
address, be it by client or gateway. And at that point, the mapping
can be to an anycast address.
 
> Alex

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
	warning: do not ever send email to spam at dishone.st
Fortune:
Got Mole problems?  Call Avogadro at 6.02 x 10^23.

• Previous message (by thread): How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
• Next message (by thread): How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]