How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
LarrySheldon at cox.net
Thu Feb 26 16:35:19 UTC 2004
Roland Perry wrote:
> In article
> <578F3C8F6DD3D411850600508BF320CA03A60E64 at aries-exch1.uk.eu.corp.vizzavi.
> net>, "Pendergrass, Greg" <Greg.Pendergrass at vodafone.com> writes
>
>> if you want to call an ambulance you DON'T use the internet
>
> And you also need a way to persuade the Ambulance Service not to
> terminate their calls via VoIP, or send dispatch instructions via
> public-IP over GSM (or whatever) to their vehicles.
I think we will need also to make it illegal (to control the liability
issues) to need emergency assistance in a place whose only link
is via "public-IP". (I hear that there are places in Papua New Guinea
that are being brought "on-line" where everything (EVERYthing) else is
stone-age-standard.)
> Or the IP bits need to be assured as "good enough" that it doesn't matter.
>
> It's perhaps three years since I heard that there was real possibility
> of some of the above. That stable door may be more open than you think.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list