New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks

Tue Feb 24 18:13:28 UTC 2004

Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

>
>Correct, but only in the absence of more specific filtering.
>the problem this proposal aims to correct is the increasing number of
>false positives caused by the apparent *serious* lag in relatively
>static bogon filtering. 
>
>  
>
Do you think this can be fixed after vendors started putting in bogon 
lists into their SME and SOHO products and let loose the consultants 
promoting them as "plug-and-play security for small office"? There is 
probably hundreds of  thousands of these devices out there.

Pete