Anti-spam System Idea
Timothy R. McKee
tim at baseworx.net
Mon Feb 16 21:19:03 UTC 2004
Personally I don't see where ingress filters that only allow registered
SMTP servers to initiate TCP connections on port 25 is irresponsible.
Any user sophisticated enough to legitimately require a running SMTP server
should also have the sophistication to create a dns entry and register it
with
his upstream in whatever manner is required.
There will never be a painless or easy solution to this problem, only a
choice where we select the lesser of all evils.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete at he.iki.fi]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 16:06
To: Timothy R. McKee
Cc: 'J Bacher'; nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: Anti-spam System Idea
Timothy R. McKee wrote:
>There will *never* be a concerted action by all service providers to
>filter ingress/egress on abused ports unless there is a legal
>requirement to do so. Think 'level playing field'...
>
>
Haven´t it been stated enough times previously that blindly blocking ports
is irresponsible?
There are ways to similar, if not more accurate results without resorting to
shooting everything that moves.
Pete
More information about the NANOG
mailing list