Anti-spam System Idea
Timothy R. McKee
tim at baseworx.net
Mon Feb 16 20:39:00 UTC 2004
I've spent many years in the industry... It comes down to this:
a) Being proactive costs money. Whether it be in the form of additional
engineering/operations time or beefier routers doesn't matter. No
management type will *ALLOW* the technical folks to expend resources
unless there is either 1) a certifiable return on the investment or
2) a legal requirement that *ALL* service providers do the same exact
thing.
b) Action by one provider will mostly benefit other providers,
this provides negative inducement....
c) Being proactive without some form of legal/legislative backing signifies
risk to the management types... Who's going to complain, who's going to
sue, etc....
There will *never* be a concerted action by all service providers to
filter ingress/egress on abused ports unless there is a legal requirement
to do so. Think 'level playing field'...
Tim McKee
More information about the NANOG
mailing list