[IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls

Tue Feb 10 05:03:44 UTC 2004

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:37:09 GMT, Paul Vixie <vixie at vix.com>  said:

> this is nanog at .  if you think sitefinder poses an operational problem
> then please describe it (dispassionately).  if you think there is an
> operational thing that ought to be done in response to sitefinder, then
> please describe that (dispassionately).  the response you included...

Has Verisign published a in-depth technical discussion of what they
are thinking of deploying, including details such as what happens to
MX entries, what they intend to do with mail misrouted to them, and so on?

(Yes, that's an operational issue - if they are harvesting and selling a
list of known-good From: addresses on misrouted mail, this will eventually
end up adding to spam - and that's operational)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20040210/6f69986e/attachment.sig>