abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous task of making a list)
Steven M. Bellovin
smb at research.att.com
Mon Feb 9 01:08:29 UTC 2004
In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402081037470.7997-100000 at uplift.swm.pp.se>, Mikael A
brahamsson writes:
>
>On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> The problem with trojans etc is that there so damn many of them, so the
>> less time spent actually tracking down the user who was on IP X at time
>> Y, the better it is for the ISP's staffers who handle complaints about
>> these.
>
>I have asked about this before. Wouldnt it be very nice if there was a
>standardized way to report IP-number and timestamp and type of complaint?
>
I'm very concerned about the authorization problem -- do you define
"abuse" the same was as the reporter? There was an AP wire story a few
days ago on how the Chinese government is trying to crack down on junk
email because of
many which were
pornographic or reactionary, or promoted gambling or spread computer
viruses,'' the official Xinhua News Agency said, citing the China
Police Daily.
To me, "reactionary" email isn't cause for a report. But it is to some
governments.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
More information about the NANOG
mailing list