Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks?
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri Feb 6 18:12:25 UTC 2004
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:05:52PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
>
> > >> Based on the results it seems to be easy to conclude that about the
> > >> only reason to put IPv6 over [v4 over] MPLS on the networks (rather
> > >> than directly on top of the physical infrastructure) is due to the
> > >> other reason, because some vendors have sold crappy hardware which
> > >> does not support IPv6, or does not offer sufficiently good IPv6
> > >> performance.
> > > Even hardware with good IPv6 performance seems to forward at half the
> rate
> > > of IPv4/MPLS packets;
> >
> > we call that crappy hardware
>
> Based on such point of view, non-crappy hardware would be: (blank) and
> crappy hardware would be (blank), could you fill the blanks ?
As with so many other situations, the blanks can be filled in with
"Juniper" and "Cisco", in that order.
http://www.juniper.net/company/presscenter/pr/2001/pr-011128.html
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list