Unbelievable Spam.

vijay gill vgill at vijaygill.com
Tue Feb 3 15:56:55 UTC 2004


On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:31:00AM +0000, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> 
> inject large volumes of email into the system? The existing
> non-hierarchical email exchange network is not scalable.
> I hope that everyone on this list can understand what the
> email exchange overlay network is and recognize that it
> is subject to similar scaling rules as the underlying IP 
> network.

So you are saying that the existing email exchange network
is not scalable because it is non-hierarchical?

It looks like its scaled pretty well so far. Maybe I'm 
not understanding something.

The entire paragraph quoted appears to be entirely content
free except for some various assertions. Could you elaborate
further on

1) how the existing non-hierarchical email exchange network is
not scalable. What are your definitions of "scale" and what
are the current choking points that you see?

2) the email exchange overlay network and the similarities
to the underlying ip network with elaborations on how the
hierarchy of IP maps to the hierarchy in email overlays.

thanks

/vijay



More information about the NANOG mailing list