[Fwd: zone transfers, a spammer's dream?]

Kandra Nygårds kandra at foxette.net
Thu Dec 9 17:46:32 UTC 2004


Alex Bligh wrote:

>> The irony of all this is that spammers already have all this information
>> -- yet registrars have gone out of their way to make it as difficult as
>> possible for everyone else to get it (rate-limiting queries and so on).
> 
> They clearly don't "already have" this information, or they wouldn't
> be
> a) offering to pay people for it
> b) continue to be trying to obtain it by data mining.

There are lots of small-time spammers. Rest assured that the big fish 
already have access to most major zonefiles.


> Your argument is roughly equivalent to "The irony of this is that drug
> dealers already have drugs -- yet governments have gone out of their
> way to make it as difficult as possible for everyone else to get them".
> Or "Credit card fraudsters already have credit card numbers - yet
> credit card companies have gone out of their way to make it is
> difficult as possible for everyone else to get them".

Drugs are bad. Domains aren't. For a certain value of aren't.
Credit card numbers are all you need to commit fraud. Domains aren't. 
For a certain value of aren't.


> IE sure, there's a lot of leaked information out there (often including
> personal data), that doesn't mean responsible registries should add
> to it.

Such as... selling access to the data to anyone who pays? No, 
responsible registries should of course not do this.


- Kandra



More information about the NANOG mailing list