[OT] Re: Banned on NANOG

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at outblaze.com
Sun Dec 5 03:20:40 UTC 2004


Daniel Golding <dgolding at burtongroup.com> wrote:

> The complaints concerning list moderation certainly have merit (no pun
> intended). There are wildly inconsistent moderation standards along with a
> growing fear of being banned from a wide variety of folks. The least

Well, for example, Randy seems to have been banned soon after he substituted
the more usual "North American Noise and Offtopic Gripes" with "ops sheep
willing to be censored by a non op" in a nanog post that was otherwise
operational in content (nanog thread "anycast stability experiment")

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2004/msg00183.html

> The "if you don't like it, start your own" suggestion is not a bad idea.
> However, many folks in the community have an investment in NANOG, and, as

cf Bugtraq readers forking to start full-disclosure at lists.netsys.com?

	srs



More information about the NANOG mailing list