Senator Diane Feinstein Wants to know about the Benefits of P2P
Ted Fischer
ted at fred.net
Tue Aug 31 16:49:20 UTC 2004
Big Snip ...
>At 07:03 PM 8/30/2004, Sean Donlan postualted:
>Is the problem P2P? Or is the problem copyright infringement?
Thank you, Sean.
What does Peer-to-Peer mean, anyway. Unfortunately, lots of things.
One could argue (I've seen a few replies re this subject hinting around
this definition) that the entire Internet works because of the Peer-to-Peer
concept. After all, if I am on a 100MBs Ethernet and want to communicate
directly with another NIC on MY ethernet, then we must be Peer at Layer 1.
Is the Peer-to-Peer ethernet network a danger?
I would tell her that the benefits of Peer-to-Peer is that this concept
allows us to communicate on networks using computers ... Including allowing
Senator Feinstein to receive E-Mail replies to her question (after all,
isn't SMTP (or X.400 for that matter) Peer-to-Peer at Layer 7?).
Until Senator Feinstein asks a meaningful question, the result will be
GIGO.
Ted Fischer
More information about the NANOG
mailing list