BGP-based blackholing/hijacking patented in Australia?

Niels Bakker niels=nanog at bakker.net
Fri Aug 13 16:28:34 UTC 2004


* michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us (Michel Py) [Fri 13 Aug 2004, 16:04 CEST]:
>> william(at)elan.net wrote:
>> The only imlementation change to do this would be to provide
>> a link from the webpage where user might have been redirected
>> to the original website they wanted to access
> 
> But the user never wanted to access the site in the first place; lots
> of these phishing scams either promise a free something or say that the
> account will be de-activated, none of which exist. The reason to visit
> a web site never existed in reality.

Do you propose blocking goatse/tubgirl as well?  The same reasoning can
apply to those sites.


	-- Niels.

-- 
Today's subliminal thought is: 



More information about the NANOG mailing list