SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?)

Tue Aug 10 14:24:18 UTC 2004

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:17:17 -0000, Paul Vixie said:

> i suspect it's not the number of RR's or even the obscurity of those RR's,
> but rather the fact that the RR's keep changing in number, kind, and name,

Well, "That RR looked totally different last month" certainly qualifies said RR
as "weird" ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20040810/e51c7658/attachment.sig>