Quick question about secondary addresses
Will Hargrave
will at harg.net
Tue Aug 3 10:12:29 UTC 2004
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:21:06AM -0700, Dan Lockwood wrote:
> I'm in a debate with a guy over the use of 'ip address x.x.x.x s.s.s.s
> secondary' on Cisco gear. I seem to remember reading that the use of
> secondary addresses is a bad idea, but I can't recall the details of
> why. Process switched? Can anyone offer a resource or more specific
> information?
One which hasn't been mentioned - DHCP will break horribly if the dhcp
shared-subnets declarations don't match the multinetted subnets on the wire.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list