Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?

Mon Apr 26 05:50:28 UTC 2004

hmm; why do you keep questioning people how to run their own networks?

step 1. know the limits of your devices
step 2. know the limits and purpose of each routing protocols
step 3. test test test
step 4. does it work for you? if yes: do it, if no: don't

it may be entirely approprirate to have a L3 switch run bgp just for
internal / small number of prefixes, or for other reasons, depends
on the hardware limits and configuration of your topology.

getting back to the topic, 2950 switches can create dot1q vlan tags,
so can 3500. so can 2900XL but never tried myself..

-J

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:31:25PM -0700, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
> 
> Hmm; why do you want to keep BGP on a switch  instead of installing separate
> router? Do you have a very wide uplink (uplinks)?
> 
> // I do not object an idea.
> 
> 
> >
> > Yes. I've been looking at it and a 7505 with a 3550 behind it seems the
> > way to go for our type of operation.
> >
> > As a cost cutting alternative - has anyone played with the 2900 XL
> > series using sub interfaces to turn them into virtual router ports ? or
> > vlan groups ?
> > Is it better to just buy a 3550 ?
> >
> > Alexander Hagen
> > Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
> > 527 Sixth Street No 371261
> > Montara CA 94037
> > Main Line: (650)-728-3375
> > Direct Line: (650) 728-3086
> > Cell: (650) 740-0650 (Does not work at our office in Montara)
> > Home: (Emgcy or weekends) 650-728-5820
> > fax: (650) 240-1750
> > http://www.etheric.net
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 5:09 AM
> > To: Alexander Hagen
> > Cc: 'Robert E. Seastrom'; 'Tom (UnitedLayer)'; nanog at merit.edu
> > Subject: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
> > or other vendor ?
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:
> >
> > > 1) Catalyst 6006 w/ CATALYST 6000 SUPERVISOR ENGINE 1-A, 2GE, PLUS
> > MSFC
> > > & PFC
> >
> > Yuck. Unless you have very few flows you do not want to use MSFC1/PFC1.
> >
> > This platform would be good for a file server with few but highspeed
> > flows.
> >
> > > This system costs somewhere around 1300.00 more than a:
> > >  Cisco 7505 w RSP4 256 Plus (2) VIP 2-50/128 and 3 PA-FE-TX
> > >
> > > Obviously the Catalyst is a better unit. But will it be as "burned in"
> > > and robust as the venerable 7505 ?
> >
> > The 7505 will probably handle lots of flows massively better than the
> > SUP1A.
> >
> > -- 
> > Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> >

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                        Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing
james at towardex.com                  Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net