Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?
Pete Templin
petelists at templin.org
Sun Apr 25 11:49:23 UTC 2004
Alexander Hagen wrote:
> I bought a Riverstone Rs-3000 for BGP with a single upstream provider.
> Great Deal.
Yeah, it might be a Great Deal (tm), but you're in for some surprises.
I've seen an RS-8600 (with CM3 and 512MB on board) nearly melt under
13Mbps of Nachi, to the point that I had to set the CM failover
keepalive timer to >30 seconds. We had a failover one night due to CPU
exhaustion - I think the route reconvergence was actually worse than the
performance of the box prior to the failover, but that's just my
opinion. I've also seen the same unit nearly melt under 9Mbps of SQL
Slammer - the CPU was so busy setting up flows that it was unable to
rate limit this customer to 1Mbps or anywhere close. On a box with a
64Gbps backplane, I'm certainly not impressed, though I guess if I just
used it as a switch it'd be happy.
Plus, you'll have a whole new learning curve for BGP. Wanna use a route
map outbound? Expect it to reference the whole RIB, not just the BGP
routes you've learned, redistributed, or flagged locally for
announcement. Wanna edit a route map? sh run groups similar commands
together, but sorts them in the order they were input, regardless of
route map name and/or sequence number. The only strong point that jumps
out is the ability to comment - I just wrote "ALL" of the route maps I
thought I'd need and commented the maintenance and emergency segments
before deploying it. And I guess cascading route maps on BGP sessions
is a benefit, at least to overcome the CLI sorting.
pt
More information about the NANOG
mailing list