why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Apr 20 20:31:42 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As co-chair of the multi6 WG :
On 2004-04-19, at 02.29, william(at)elan.net wrote:
> Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not
> attractive
> at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100
> years
> is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on things
> like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem,
> the
> cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing
> number
> of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me
> almost everywhere at least).
No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks
have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the
various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The
discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do
encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that
discussion!
Best regards,
- - kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQIWIs6arNKXTPFCVEQLU/wCdFxVLrTswwUL5GQgei+sfuYTJPfwAoNzw
o1GimcbzYp72ngq16PI44Jws
=+GuV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list