Lazy network operators

Petri Helenius pete at he.iki.fi
Wed Apr 14 09:17:47 UTC 2004


Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:

>That was solved 6 years ago. You let them use port 587 instead of 25.
>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2476.html
>  
>

How many MUAs default to port 587? How many even know about 587 and give 
it as an option other than fill-in-the-blank?

...back to the computer literacy requirement again...

How many support calls you get by requiring 587 instead of 25?

Pete




More information about the NANOG mailing list