Lazy network operators
Petri Helenius
pete at he.iki.fi
Wed Apr 14 09:17:47 UTC 2004
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>That was solved 6 years ago. You let them use port 587 instead of 25.
>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2476.html
>
>
How many MUAs default to port 587? How many even know about 587 and give
it as an option other than fill-in-the-blank?
...back to the computer literacy requirement again...
How many support calls you get by requiring 587 instead of 25?
Pete
More information about the NANOG
mailing list