Lazy network operators

• Previous message (by thread): abuse standards & consumer reports
• Next message (by thread): Lazy network operators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11 Apr 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:

> on the other hand, i just want to say, many isp's are in business to make
> money not save the world, and if a stronger AUP would mean fewer customers,
> then the management team is going to have a very hard time justifying a
> stronger AUP to their shareholders.

Surely no coincidence then that their change in abuse policy occurs at a time 
when they are cutting customer support by 30%:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/07/ntl_jobs_cut/

Theres a followup discussing their poor CS queue times:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/08/ntl_jobs_union/

so it seems when the going gets tough, the staff perceived to be non-essential 
(indirect to the revenue stream) are going! 

No surprise I guess

Steve

• Previous message (by thread): abuse standards & consumer reports
• Next message (by thread): Lazy network operators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]