Spam with no purpose?

Tue Apr 6 03:53:51 UTC 2004

Once upon a time, Scott Call <scall at devolution.com> said:
> Kinda of makes you wonder if AP and the like could go after spammers
> habeaus style on copyright infringement.  Since the spam is a source of
> revenue, it could be construed as criminal copyright infringement as well
> as civil....

Why bother with copyright sources; I don't expect I'm giving anyone any
ideas, but how much (grammatically correct) text is in Project
Gutenberg?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.