Another DNS blacklist is taken down
Mike Tancsa
mike at sentex.net
Mon Sep 29 17:59:38 UTC 2003
At 01:49 PM 29/09/2003, Jared Mauch wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:11:08PM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> > Isn't that collateral damage issue enough to have angered hundreds of ISPs
> > & end users to the point of not necessarily organizing a DDoS, but ignoring
> > it? I think it is far _more_ likely that the DDoS came from the innocent
> > victims fighting back rather than the spammers.
>
> Presently I beg to differ. (I do encourage you to prove me wrong :)
Especially in the case of SPAMHAUS, they were no XRBL. What networks were
really listed as collateral damage ? I dont see how willtel was an
innocent bystander either in the previous case.
---Mike
More information about the NANOG
mailing list