[OT] question on NANOG meetings

Petri Helenius pete at he.iki.fi
Sat Sep 27 15:31:16 UTC 2003


Brandon Butterworth wrote:

>>the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said 
>>from either WM or RM.
>>    
>>
>
>Quality of the link from encoder to Real server is important, send
>garbage to the server and it has nothing to distribute.
>
>  
>
One can screw it up earlier than that, send garbage to the encoder and 
it spends 90%
of the available bandwidth encoding noise.

>I get the impression it's done in band with other NANOG traffic and may
>be suffering against the warez traffic.
>
>  
>
Diffserv anyone?

Pete





More information about the NANOG mailing list