Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists?
Eric A. Hall
ehall at ehsco.com
Thu Sep 25 19:31:23 UTC 2003
on 9/24/2003 9:30 PM Drew Weaver wrote:
> I know you all have probably already thought of this, but
> can anyone think of a feasible way to run a RBL list that does not have
> a single point of failure? Or any attackable entry?
Easy. Have the master server only be reachable by replication partners
through a VPN connection, and have dozens of secondaries advertising
through multiple anycast addresses.
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list