Verisign Responds

Crist Clark crist.clark at globalstar.com
Tue Sep 23 18:25:35 UTC 2003


bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:
> > > > > Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net
> > > > > and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.
> > > > ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind,
> > > > how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for
> > > > all DNS?
> > >     That would be making a fundamental change to the DNS
> > >     to make wildcards illegal anywhere. Is that what you
> > >     want?
> >
> > no it wouldnt. it would ust make wildcards illegal in top level domains,
> > not subdomains.
> >
> > -Dan
> 
>         really? and how would that work? (read be enforced...)

The same way all RFCs and Standards are enforced, by the IETF Delta
Squad Elite Stormtrooper Interdiction Unit Strike Force.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                               crist.clark at globalstar.com
Globalstar Communications                                (408) 933-4387



More information about the NANOG mailing list