Providers removing blocks on port 135?

John Kristoff jtk at depaul.edu
Mon Sep 22 01:51:05 UTC 2003


On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:01:27PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> The problem is many "clients" act as servers for part of the transaction.
[...]
> And do we really want to discuss peer-to-peer networking, which as
> the name suggests, peer-to-peer.

The Internet has always consisted of peer-to-peer hosts.  It seems odd
that people talk about peer-to-peer as a new feature.

...and are there similarities with those basic assumptions and those
people expected from the .com/.net domains?

For either case, have you (the collective recipients of this email)
thought both long and hard about those two issues.  Are your beliefs
about each compatible?

John



More information about the NANOG mailing list