Root Server Operators (Re: What are they smoking?)

Thu Sep 18 14:31:27 UTC 2003

Paul Vixie wrote:

> actually, i had it convincingly argued to me today that wildcards in root
> or top level domains were likely to be security problems, and that domains
> like .museum were the exception rather than the rule, and that bind's
> configuration should permit a knob like "don't accept anything but delegations
> unless it's .museum or a non-root non-tld".  i guess the ietf has a lot to
> think about now.
> 

Paul,

I would argue as seen in some of my other posts, that the wildcard 
feature of .museum is not always wanted either. Would it not be wise to 
push forward into the future with support for software to request if it 
wants a wildcard or not? While a wildcard bit is ideal, there are 
methods of determining wildcard programatically. Being able to cache and 
handle such information is important as different applications have 
different requirements.

After all, is this the Internet or just the World Wide Web? wildcards at 
the roots are catering solely to the web and disrupting other protocols 
which require NXDOMAIN.

-Jack

Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?)

Root Server Operators (Re: What are they smoking?)