Worst design decisions?

David Lesher wb8foz at nrk.com
Thu Sep 18 12:57:11 UTC 2003


Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Was doing some upgrades on a UBR7246 (to a VXR), and I got to thinking 
> about short sighted design considerations.  I was curious if any of you 
> had some pet peeves from a design perspective to rant about.  I'll start 
> with a couple.


1) The slide lock on transceiver cables.

2) Intel's+IBM's "640K" wall.

3) IDE addressing standards. (We've been through the 528 MB,
2.1 GB, 4.2 GB, 8.4 GB caps.... what's next?)


2 & 3 are basically failures to look ahead far enough. We have
lots of those. Some would say IPV4 is one, but I'll give them
a little more credit than most....


 


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz at nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433



More information about the NANOG mailing list